The Role of Metonymy in Shaping the Advertising Worldview (Based on the Appliance and Electronics Advertisements)

This article explores the use of metonymy in advertising discourse through a detailed analysis of slogans in appliance and electronics advertisements. The influence of metonymy on one’s worldview in the context of commercial advertising was studied based on its contribution to the construction of the images of the object (product or service), subject (seller or manufacturer), and addressee (consumer), as well as to the development of connections between these three elements. The value and relevance of the research lie in the fact that advertising broadcasts ideas about reality and has the potential to influence the consumer’s mindset and behavior. This supports the concept of advertising worldview. It is also important to perceive metonymy as a linguistic and cognitive tool, yet in advertising discourse it is often viewed as a trope. The dynamics of the advertising situation can be defined as follows: the manufacturer/seller offers a solution to the consumer’s problems and promises them joy in the final result, with the product or service acting as a tool to achieve the desired outcome. A number of examples were provided to show that the knowledge about the components of the advertising situation is arranged in the categories of different conceptual structures which determine the type of metonymic transfer. In appliance advertisements, the most frequent metonymic models were found to be as follows: the product’s quality–the product, the result of using the product–the tool employed to achieve the result, describing the situation through the nomination of the stage of turning on the device or achieving the result. It was concluded that metonymy emphasizes the most important characteristics of the product and its role in human life, not only as a problem-solving tool but also as a source of positive emotions and joy, as well as a symbol of a certain lifestyle. Therefore, the metonymic approach is effective in fitting the product into the everyday life of the consumer with respect to their system of values. 

1. Serebrennikov B.A., Kubryakova E.S., Postovalova V.I., et al. Rol’ chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira [The Role of Human Factor in Language: Language and Worldview]. Serebrennikov B.A. (Ed.). Moscow, Nauka, 1988. 212 p. (In Russian)

2. Zaliznyak A.A., Levontina I.B., Shmelev A.D. Klyuchevye idei russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira [Key Ideas of the Russian Linguistic Worldview]. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyan. Kul’t., 2005. 540 p. (In Russian)

3. Ezhova E.N. Media-reklamnaya kartina mira: lyudi i veshchi [Worldview in Media and Advertising: People and Things]. Moscow, Ileksa; Stavropol, Izd. Stavrop. Gos. Univ., 2010. 175 p. (In Russian)

4. Rezanova Z.I. Language- and discursive worldview – aspects of a relationship. Sibirskii Filologicheskii Zhurnal, 2011, no. 3, pp. 184–194. (In Russian)

5. Anis’kina N.V. The axiological worldview of a modern advertising consumer. Mediaskop, 2015, no 1. URL: http://mediascope7.mediascope.ru/?q=node/1688. (In Russian)

6. Kvyat A.G. Linguo-cognitive techniques of positioning goods and services. Cand. Philol. Diss. Omsk, 2010. 193 p. (In Russian)

7. Pirogova Yu.K., Baranov A.N., Parshin P.B., et al. Reklamnyi tekst: semiotika i lingvistika [Advertising Text: Semiotics and Linguistics]. Pirogova Yu.K., Parshin P.B. (Eds.). Moscow, Izd. Dom Grebennikova, 2000. 270 p. (In Russian)

8. Ezhova E.N. Media and advertising worldview: Objects, subjects, and attributes. Medialingvistika, 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 398–408. (In Russian)

9. Barthes R. Advertising. In: Sistema mody. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury [The Fashion System. Essays on the Semiotics of Culture]. Мoscow, Izd. im. Sabashnikovykh, 2003, pp. 410–415. (In Russian)

10. Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: chasti rechi s cognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira [Language and Knowledge: On the Way to Gaining Knowledge about Language: Parts of Speech from a Cognitive Point of View. The Role of Language in Understanding the World]. Мoscow, Yazyki Slavyan. Kul’t., 2004. 555 p. (In Russian)

11. Radden G., Kövecses Z. Towards a theory of metonymy. In: Panther K.-U., Radden G. (Eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought. Pt. I: Theoretical aspects of metonymy. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA, John Benjamins, 1999, pp. 17–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad.

12. Ilyukhina N.A. On the typology of lexical metonymy in the light of the cognitive principle. Vestnik SamGU, 2015, no. 7, pp. 36–48. (In Russian)

13. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Baranov A.N. (Ed.). Moscow, Editorial URSS, 2004. 256 p. (In Russian)

14. Paducheva E.V.To the cognitive theory of metonymy. In: Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii [Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies]. Proc. Int. Conf. Dialog’2003 (Protvino, June 11–16, 2003). Kobozeva et al. (Eds.). URL: https://www.dialog-21.ru/media/2674/ paducheva.pdf. (In Russian)

15. Rezinkin A.Yu. The functioning of metonymic nominations in the German political media discourse. Cand. Philol. Diss. Barnaul, 2012. 240 p. (In Russian)

16. Barthes R. Semantics of the object. In: Sistema mody. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury [The Fashion System. Essays on the Semiotics of Culture]. Moscow, Izd. im. Sabashnikovykh, 2003, pp. 416–426. (In Russian)

17. Nazaikin A.N. Effektivnyi reklamnyi tekst v SMI [Effective Advertising Text in the Media]. Moscow, Fak. Zhurnalistiki MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, Izd. Mosk. Univ., 2011. 476 p. (In Russian)

18. Ilyukhina N.A. Discourse as a sphere of interaction between the speaker and the listener (on the cognitive discourse approach to the study of language figurativeness). Funktsionirovanie yazyka: kategorii i metody issledovaniya: materialy region. nauch. konf., Samara, 28 fevralya–01 marta 2006 g. [Language Functioning: Categories and Research Methods: Proc. Reg. Sci. Conf., Samara, February 28–March 1, 2006]. Ilyukhina N.A. (Ed.). Samara, Izd. Samar. Univ., 2006, pp. 31–40. (In Russian)