On the concept of legal liability institutions
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.6.7-18
Abstract
The nature and distinguishing features of legal liability institutions in the legal system were analyzed. The tendency to define legal institutions in the branches of law solely through the legislative factor (tied to regulatory acts) was criticized. Distinctions were made between the concepts of “legal liability type” and “legal liability institution,” highlighting the key differences between them. Additional evidence was provided to support the identification of legal liability institutions by relating them to particular branches of law, which are considered the structural elements of the legal system at both macro- and micro-levels. The mechanical classification of legal liability institutions belonging to various branches of law within public or private law was challenged. The practice of treating private and public law liability, along with procedural and substantive liability, as a set of institutions associated with specific legal branches was questioned. The conclusion was made about the need to raise the issue of legal liability legislation that does not mirror the structure of legal liability institutions existing in the legal branches. This differentiation would create an effective legal liability system, without complicating it with numerous legal entities.
References
1. Lipinsky D.A. On the legal system and types of legal liability. Pravovedenie, 2003, no. 2 (247), pp. 27–37. (In Russian)
2. Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’: teoreticheskie voprosy [Legal Liability: Theoretical Issues]. Krasnoyarsk, Izd. Krasnoyarsk. Univ., 1985. 120 p. (In Russian)
3. Chechina N.A., Elkind P.S. On criminal procedural and civil procedural liability. Sovetskoe Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 1973, no. 9, pp. 31–41. (In Russian)
4. Bobrova N.A., Zrazhevskaya T.D. Otvetstvennost’ v sisteme garantii konstitutsionnykh norm [Responsibility in the System of Constitutional Safeguards]. Voronezh, Izd. Voronezh. Univ., 1985. 153 p. (In Russian)
5. Khachaturov R.L., Lipinsky D.A. Obshchaya teoriya yuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti [General Theory of Legal Liability]. St. Petersburg, Yurid. Tsentr-Press, 2007. 934 p. (In Russian)
6. Lisitsa V.N. Investment law of Russia as a complex branch of law. Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Pravo, 2008, vol. 4, pp. 14–23. (In Russian)
7. Golovistikova A.N., Grudtsyna L.Yu. On the issue of recognizing human rights as a complex branch of law. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2009, no. 1, pp. 23–35. (In Russian)
8. Alferov A.N. Information law within the broader system of legal branches. Sibirskii Yuridicheskii Vestnik, 2007, no. 4 (39), pp. 3–6. (In Russian)
9. Tolkachev K.B. Anticorruption law and the theoretical and legal issues of anticorruption legislation systematization. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi Akademii MVD RF, 2017, no. 3 (39), pp. 11–21. (In Russian)
10. Dudikov M.V. Mining law in the system of legal branches. Lex Russica, 2015, vol. 104, no. 7, pp. 43–56. (In Russian)
11. Belykh V.S. The concept of banking law and its place in the legal system of Russia. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, 2011, no. 4. pp. 5–13. (In Russian)
12. Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A. The system of law and the system of legal liability: Some problems of their relationship and alignment. Pravo i Politika, 2019, no. 9, pp. 29–47. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2019.9.30581. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=30581. (In Russian)
13. Kislukhin V.A. Types of legal liability. Extended Abstract of Cand. Law Diss. Moscow, 2002. 26 p. (In Russian)
14. Vinogradov V.A. Konstitutsionnaya otvetstvennost’: voprosy teorii i pravovoe regulirovanie [Constitutional Liability: Theoretical Issues and Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2000. 240 p. (In Russian)
15. El’chaninov A.P., El’chaninova O.Yu. Penal liability: Framing the problem. Vektor Nauki Tol’yattinskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie Nauki, 2010, no. 3, pp. 69–71. (In Russian)
16. Chuklova E.V. The place of the procedural liability institution in the legal system. Yuridicheskaya Nauka i Pravookhranitel’naya Praktika, 2019, no. 3, pp. 6–15. (In Russian)
17. Musatkina A.A. Financial liability as a type of legal liability. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava, 2005, no. 10, pp. 142–151. (In Russian)
18. Leist O.E. The main types of legal liability for an offense. Pravovedenie, 1977, no. 3, pp. 22–42. (In Russian)
19. Kirimova E.A. Pravovoi institut: ponyatie i vidy [Legal Institution: Concept and Types]. Saratov, Izd. SGAP, 2000. 54 p. (In Russian)
20. Bolgova V.V. Public law: Problems of theory, methodology, and practice. Extended Abstract of Doct. Law Diss. Tambov, 2009. 47 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Valeeva G.A. On the concept of legal liability institutions. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2024;166(6):7-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.6.7-18
Views:
126
Email this article 