Further Discussion on the Oath of the Rus… (Responding to D.V. Puzanov)
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.92-102
Abstract
This article is a response to the criticism by D.V. Puzanov. The main arguments and counterarguments are summarized. New evidence is provided in favor of the hypothesis that the oaths taken by the pagan Rus and the Greeks to ratify the agreements between them assumed that the oath breakers would be magically slayed by their own “animated” weapons. This is because the Scandinavians, including the Rus, believed that their weapons were “alive” and capable of “reviving” or “dying” regardless of the owner’s desire. The images of the Scandinavian ornaments with “living” weapons acting independently of their owners are analyzed. Through a number of examples, the practical attitude of the Scandinavians to their faith is shown: they treated the gods as partners in a kind of agreement about divine help. References are provided to the historiographical sources that support the idea of animation of weapons in the Scandinavian and Rus cultures, in which weapons appeared as living creatures with their life paths and destinies, as well as capable of physical action, “reviving”, and “dying”.
About the Author
О. L. Gubarev
“Troitskii Variant–Nauka” Newspaper
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Troitsk, 142191
References
1. Gubarev O.L. About the oaths of the Rus and Slavs. Stratum plus, 2013, no. 5, pp. 239–245. (In Russian)
2. Puzanov D.V. Were weapons of the Normans and Rus’ “alive”? Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2021, vol. 163, no. 6, pp. 168–178. https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2021.6.168-178. (In Russian)
3. Kovalevskii A.P. Kniga Akhmeda Ibn-Fadlana o ego puteshestvii na Volgu v 921–922 gg. Stat’i, perevody i kommentarii [Ahmad ibn Fadlan’s Book about His Journey to the Volga Area in 921–922. Articles, Translations, and Commentaries]. Kharkiv, Izd. Khar’k. Univ., 1956. 347 p. (In Russian)
4. Kotlyarevskii A.A. Drevnosti yuridicheskogo byta baltiiskih slavyan. Opyt sravnitel’nogo izucheniya slavyanskogo prava [Antiquities of the Legal Life of Baltic Slavs. An Attempt of Comparative Studies in Slavic Law]. Prague, Tip. K.L.Klaudi, 1874. 168 p. (In Russian)
5. Kuleshov V.S. Gold bracelets of the Rus people in the 9th–11th centuries: Texts, things, and functions. In: V kamne i v bronze: Sb. st. v chest’ A. Peskovoi [In Stone and Bronze: A Collection of Articles in Honor of A. Peskova]. St. Petersburg, Nevskaya Kn. Tip., 2017, pp. 253–258. Trudy Instituta Istorii Material’noi Kul’tury, vol. 48. (In Russian)
6. Mel’nikova E.A. “Bracelets” of the unbaptized Russia in the Rus–Byzantine Treaty of 944 and the “oath rings” of the Old Norse legal tradition. Srednie Veka, 2014, no. 75 (3-4), pp.176–192. (In Russian)
7. Fetisov A.A. Ritual content of the oath by weapons in the Rus–Byzantine treaties of the 10th century. In: Fetisov A.A., Shchavelev A.S. Vikingi. Mezhdu Skandinaviei i Rus’yu [Vikings. Between Scandinavia and Rus]. Moscow, Veche, 2009, pp. 295–314. (In Russian)
8. Eriksen M.H. The powerful ring. Door rings, oath rings and the sacral place. In: Eriksen M.H., Pedersen U., Rundberget B., Axelsen I., Berg H.L. (Eds.) Viking Worlds: Things, Spaces and Movement. Ch. 6. Oxford, Oxbow Books, 2014, pp. 73–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dgwk.10.
9. Romanchuk A.A. The origin of the oaths sworn by the Rus on “weapons and bracelets”: Slavic, Germanic, and Celtic parallels. Revista Arheologica, serie noua, 2018, vol. XIV, no. 1, pp. 93–107. (In Russian)
10. Karlin-Hayter P. “Swift Danes”. Byzantion, 1965, vol. 35, no. 1, p. 359.
11. Gubarev O.L. “As long as the sun shines and the whole world stays” (a magic formula in the agreement between the Rus and the Greeks in 945). Valla, 2017, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 16–22. (In Russian)
12. Dolgov V.V. Byt i nravy Drevnei Rusi. Miry povsednevnosti XI – XIII vv. [Everyday Life and Customs in Ancient Rus. The Worlds of Daily Routine in the 11th–13th Centuries]. St. Petersburg, Izd. Olega Abyshko, 2017. 592 p. (In Russian)
13. Riisoy A.I. Performing oaths in eddic poetry: Viking Age fact or Medieval fiction? Journal of the North Atlantic, 2016, spec. vol. 8, pp. 141–156. https://doi.org/10.3721/037.002.sp811.
14. Brunning S. The “living” sword in early medieval Northern Europe: An interdisciplinary study. PhD Thesis. Vol. 1: Thesis, appendices and bibliography London. Univ. Coll. London, 2013. 406 p.
15. Brunning S. The “living” sword in early medieval Northern Europe: An interdisciplinary study. PhD Thesis. Vol. 2: Illustrative material. London, Univ. Coll. London, 2013. 500 p.
16. Tvorogov O.V. Endnotes. In: Slovo o polku Igoreve [The Tale of Igor’s Campaign]. Leningrad, Sov. Pisatel’, 1967, pp. 461–536. (In Russian)
17. Turville-Petre E.O.G. Myth and Religion of the North: The Religion of Ancient Scandinavia. Westport, Bloomsbury Publ. PLC, 1975. 340 p.
18. Mel’nikova E.A. Scandinavians in Eastern Europe: From spontaneous flow to government regulation. Rossiiskaya Istoriya, 2019, no. 4, pp. 66–81. (In Russian)
19. Ellis Davidson H.R. The Sword in Anglo-Saxon England: Its Archaeology and Literature. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962. 237 p.
20. Hamer A.J. Njáls Saga and Its Christian Background: A Study of Narrative Method. Leuven, Peeters, 2014. 292 p.
Review
For citations:
Gubarev О.L. Further Discussion on the Oath of the Rus… (Responding to D.V. Puzanov). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2023;165(4-5):92-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.92-102
Views:
219
Email this article 