The Yoke as a Metaphor in the Ancient World: From Symbolizing Imperial Domination to Signifying Subjugation
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.54-65
Abstract
This article explores the perception of the yoke as a symbol of domination and subordination in texts from Ancient Mesopotamia and the Middle East, as well as from ancient Greek and Roman writings. The metaphor of the yoke is analyzed from the perspective of both the conquerors and subjugated. In the texts of the Assyrian kings, conquest is perceived as the imposition of a yoke, while the fight for independence is portrayed as liberation from it. The Greeks adopted the concept of the yoke from the East, which explains why it was often used to describe the Greco-Persian conflict in the ancient Greek tradition. In many cases, the yoke was not only a metaphor for subordination but also had a military-political meaning. For example, the Assyrians harnessed captives to the royal chariot, while the Romans drove away captive enemies “under the yoke”, which was a structure consisting of two spears or pillars stuck into the ground with a third spear or pillar as a crossbar.
About the Authors
Е. V. Rung
Russian State University for the Humanities; Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125047;
Kazan, 420008
Е. A. Venidiktova
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazan, 420008
References
1. Chernykh P.Ya. Istorko-etimologicheskii slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Historical and Etymological Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Russ. Yazyk, 1999. 624 p. (In Russian)
2. Chernykh P.Ya. Istorko-etimologicheskii slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka [Historical and Etymological Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Russ. Yazyk, 1999. 560 p. (In Russian)
3. Dvoretskii I.Kh. Latinsko-russkii slovar’ [Latin-Russian Dictionary]. Moscow, Russ. Yazyk, 1976. 1096 p. (In Russian)
4. Oppenheim L.A., Reiner E. (Eds.). The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Vol. 1(A), Pt. 1. Chicago, IL, Orient. Inst., 1964. 428 p.
5. Reiner E., Biggs R. (Eds.). The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Vol. 11(N), Pt. 2. Chicago, IL, Orient. Inst., 1980. 380 p.
6. Botterweck G.J. Ringgren H., Fabry H.-J. Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. Vol. 11. Michigan, IN, Cambridge, UK, William B. Eerdmans Publ. Co., Grand Rapids, 2015. 639 p.
7. Pongratz-Leisten B. The interplay of military strategy and cultic practice in Assyrian politics. In: Assyria 1995: Proc. 10th Anniv. Symp. of the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki, September 7–11, 1995. Parpola S., Whiting R.M. (Eds.). Helsinki, Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, 1997. pp. 245–252.
8. Holloway S.W. Aššur is King! Aššur is King! Religion in the Exercise of Power in the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Leiden, Boston, Köln, Brill, 2002. 628 p.
9. Ladynin I.A. Reminiscences of the reign of Senwosret I in the works of Hecataeus of Abdera and Diodorus Siculus about the King Sesoosis. In: M.A. Chagodaev, N.V. Lavrent’eva (Eds.) Aegyptiaca Rossica: sb. st. [Aegyptiaca Rossica: A Collection of Articles]. Moskow, Russ. Fond Sodeistviyu Obraz. Nauke, 2015. pp. 136–156. (In Russian)
10. Postgate J.N. The land of Assur and the yoke of Assur. World Archaeology, 1992, vol. 23, no. 3: Archaeology of empires, pp. 247–263.
11. Liverani M. Thoughts on the Assyrian Empire and Assyrian kingship. In: Frahm E. (Ed.) A Companion to Assyria. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 2017. pp. 534–546.
12. Dvoretskii I.Kh. Drevnegrechesko-russkii slovar’ [Ancient Greek-Russian Dictionary]. Vol. 1. Moscow, Gos. Izd. Inostr. Natl. Slovarei, 1958. 1043 p. (In Russian)
13. Missiou A. ΔΟΥΛΟΣ ΤΟΥ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ: The politics of translation. Classical Quarterly, 1993, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 377–391.
14. Bridges E. Imagining Xerxes. Ancient Perspectives on a Persian King. London, New Delhi, New York, Sidney, Bloomsbury, 2014. 246 p.
15. Anderson M. The imagery of the Persians. Greece & Rome, 1972, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 166–174.
16. Dan A. Grecs et Perses sur les Détroits: le démon enchaîné et la démesure du Grand Roi. Ancient West and East, 2015, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 191–235. (In French)
17. Rung E.V. The Greco-Persian Wars in the Greek poetic tradition: From Simonides of Ceos to Aeschylus. Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 2, 2007, no. 4, pp. 149–155. (In Russian)
18. Ponikarovskaya M.V. The retelling of the Greco-Persian Wars by Aeschylus. Vestnik SanktPetersburgskogo Universiteta. Seriya 2, 2012, no. 3, pp. 123–129. (In Russian)
19. Kashcheev V.I. The liberation slogan of the Greeks in the Eastern Mediterranean interstate relations (3rd–2nd centuries B.C.). Antichnyi Mir i Arkheologiya, 1990, no. 7, pp. 41–50. (In Russian)
20. Lil van A. The pass under the yoke: Denoting the defeated in ancient Italic ritual practice. Kleos, 2020, no. 3, pp. 42–63.
Review
For citations:
Rung Е.V., Venidiktova Е.A. The Yoke as a Metaphor in the Ancient World: From Symbolizing Imperial Domination to Signifying Subjugation. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2023;165(4-5):54-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.4-5.54-65
Views:
187
Email this article 