The «Cultural Turn» in American Historiography of Environmental History from the 1980s to the Early 2000s: Causes and Consequences
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.2.208-222
Abstract
The period since the 1970s has seen a «cultural turn» that affected many areas of historical research. Environmental history is no exception. It emerged in the United States five decades ago and was strongly influenced by intellectual history. However, in the 1990s, the focus of environmental historians gradually shifted towards «new cultural history». Although foreign historiography has repeatedly acknowledged this shift, the underlying reasons that prompted historians to pursue the new research path remain overlooked. This article seeks to bridge the «gap» in the historiography of human interactions with the natural world over time, an important branch of history. The results of a thorough analysis of the major works written by American historians between the 1970s and 2010s show that the «cultural turn» in the American historiography of environmental history was gradual and included two distinct stages. During the first stage, from the 1980s to the mid-1990s, historians explored the problems of environmental history from the perspectives of postcolonial and gender discourses. The second stage, from the mid-1990s to the present day, was marked by a rethinking of the concept of «wilderness», as well as an emphasis on a variety of previously unaddressed problems of environmental history.
References
1. Deverell R.D. An historiography of environmental history. URL: https://www.academia.edu/3640656/An_Historiography_of_Environmental_History.
2. McNeill J.R. Observations on the nature and culture of environmental history. History and Theory, 2003, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2303.2003.00255.x.
3. Sutter P.S. Putting the intellectual back in environmental history. Modern Intellectual History, 2021, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244320000050.
4. Locher F., Quenet G. L’histoire environnementale: origines, enjeux et perspectives d’un nouveau chantier. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 2009, t. 56, no. 4, pp. 7–38. https://doi.org/10.3917/rhmc.564.0007. (In French)
5. Bezborodov A.B., Korchinskii A.V., Pavlenko O.V., Shkarenkov P.P. Cultural history as а basis for history education in the humanities. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Politologiya. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 2017, no. 4/2, pp. 300–305. (In Russian)
6. Repnina L.P. Kul’turnaya pamyat’ i problemy istoriopisaniya (istoriograficheskie zametki) [Cultural Memory and Problems of Historical Writing (Notes on Historiography)]. Moscow, GU VShE, 2003. 44 p. (In Russian)
7. Burke P. Chto takoe kul’turnaya istoriya? [What is Cultural History?]. Moscow, Izd. Dom VShE, 2015. 228 p. (In Russian)
8. Rajan S.R. Clarence Glacken: Pioneer environmental historian. Environment and History, 2019, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 245–267. https://doi.org/10.3197/096734018X15217309861577.
9. Sauer C.O. The morphology of landscape (1925). In: Leighly J. (Ed.) Land and Life: A Selection from the Writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, Univ. of California Press, 1969, pp. 315–350. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520309135.
10. Sauer C.O. Seventeenth Century North America. Berkeley, SF, Turtle Isl., 1980. 295 p.
11. Crosby A.W. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Ser.: Contributions in American Studies. Vol. 2. Westport, CT, London, Praeger, 2003. 284 p.
12. Nash R. American environmental history: A new teaching frontier. Pacific Historical Review, 1972, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 362–372. https://doi.org/10.2307/3637864.
13. White R. Introduction: American Indians and the environment. Environmental Review, 1985, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 101–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/envrev/9.2.101.
14. Norwood V.L. Heroines of nature: Four women respond to the American landscape. Environmental History Review, 1984, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3984520.
15. Cronon W. The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1996, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985059.
16. Cohen M.P. Comment: Resistance to wilderness. Environmental History, 1996, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985061.
17. Dunlap T.R. Comment: But what did you go out into the wilderness to see? Environmental History, 1996, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985062.
18. Hays S.P. Comment: The trouble with Bill Cronon’s wilderness. Environmental History, 1996, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985060.
19. Cronon W. The trouble with wilderness: A response. Environmental History, 1996, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985063.
20. Worster D. A Passion for Nature: The Life of John Muir. New York, NY, Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. 535 p.
21. White R. From wilderness to hybrid landscapes: The cultural turn in environmental history. The Historian, 2004, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 557–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.2004.00089.x.
22. Colten C.E. Creating a toxic landscape: Chemical waste disposal policy and practice, 1900–1960. Environmental History Review, 1994, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 85–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3984746.
23. Logan M.F. Head-cuts and check-dams: Changing patterns of environmental manipulation by the Hohokam and Spanish in the Santa Cruz River valley, 200–1820. Environmental History, 1999, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 405–430. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985134.
24. Melosi M.V. Urban infrastructure and the cultural turn. In: Haumann S., Knoll M., Mares D. (Eds.) Concepts of Urban-Environmental History. Bielefeld, transcript Verlag, 2020, pp. 145–154. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839443750-010.
25. Gugliotta A. Class, gender, and coal smoke: Gender ideology and environmental injustice in Pittsburgh, 1868–1914. Environmental History, 2000, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 165–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985634.
26. Platt H.L. Jane Addams and the ward boss revisited: Class, politics, and public health in Chicago, 1890–1930. Environmental History, 2000, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 194–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3985635.
Review
For citations:
Kislenko A.O. The «Cultural Turn» in American Historiography of Environmental History from the 1980s to the Early 2000s: Causes and Consequences. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2024;166(2):208-222. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.2.208-222
Views:
132
Email this article 