Comparative analysis of the use of zoolexicon (zoonyms) in Russian traditional and modern folk songs (a case study of zoonyms denoting domestic animals)
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2025.5-6.168-178
Abstract
A comparative diachronic study of the use of zoonyms denoting domestic animals in the Russian song genre from the 13th century up to now was carried out based on a quantitative analysis of their frequency of use, a linguoculturological analysis of their metaphorical functions, and a comparative historical interpretation of their semantic shifts. The material selected for the study included traditional (epic, ritual, lyrical, and peasant dance songs) and modern folklore. The frequency of occurrence, semantic transformations, and metaphorical functions of the identified zoonyms in different historical periods were examined. The overall evolution of zoomorphic symbolism was traced: from sacred and economic value in medieval folklore to metaphorical polyfunctionality in modern author songs. Special attention was paid to the changing connotations and stable archetypal images. The findings derived from the analysis indicate that zoonyms of the studied subgroup in Russian folk songs serve not only as means for creating imagery but also as markers of cultural memory, reflecting significant changes in worldview patterns and social practices.
About the Author
Feng Li
Kazan Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Li Feng, Assistant, Department of Sinology and Asia-Pacific Studies
Kazan, Russia
References
1. Ivanov E.E., Marfina Zh.V., Shkuran O.V. Animal nominations in Tuvan proverbs and sayings: Aspects of usage and studying. New Research of Tuva, 2022, no. 1, pp. 47–68. https://www.doi.org/10.25178/nit.2022.1.4. (In Russian)
2. Tolkovyi perevodovedcheskii slovar’ [Explanatory Dictionary of Translation Terms]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2003. 318 p. (In Russian)
3. Kovalev G.F. Zoonym as an object of study of literary onomastics. Aktual’nye Voprosy Sovremennoi Filologii i Zhurnalistiki, 2023, no. 2 (49), pp. 113–120. https://doi.org/10.36622/AQMPJ.2023.57.68.017. (In Russian)
4. Efremova T.F. Novyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatel’nyi [The New Explanatory and Word-Formation Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Vol. 2. Moscow, Russ. Yazyk, 2000. 1084 p. (In Russian)
5. Kazyro G.N., Fokina A.A. Semantics of Mari proverbs with the zoonyms imne (horse) and ushkal (cow). Vestnik Ugrovedeniya, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1 (52), pp. 82–91. https://doi.org/10.30624/2220-4156-2023-13-1-82-91. (In Russian)
6. Superanskaya A.V. Obshchaya teoriya imeni sobstvennogo [General Theory of the Proper Name]. Moscow, URSS Lenand, 2023. 366 p. (In Russian)
7. Denisov P.N., Zelenova N.K., Kochneva E.M., et al. Slovar’ sochetaemosti slov russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of Russian Collocations]. Denisov P.N., Morkovkin V.V. (Eds.). Moscow, Russ. Yazyk, 1983. 686 p. (In Russian)
8. Karasik V.I. Yazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Moscow, GNOZIS, 2004. 389 p. (In Russian)
9. Tsiv’yan T.V. Lingvisticheskie osnovy balkanskoi modeli mira [Linguistic Foundations of the Balkan Model of the World]. Vol. 2. Toporov V.N. (Ed.). Moscow, Russ. Yazyk, 2000. 1084 p. (In Russian)
10. Kostyukhin E.A. Lektsii po russkomu fol’kloru [Lectures on Russian Folklore]. Moscow, Drofa, 2004. 332 p. (In Russian)
11. Merzlikina O.V. Zoomorphic metaphors “livestock” in the Russian and Galician linguistic worldviews. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2021, no. 71, pp. 114–132. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/71/7. (In Russian)
12. Dybo A.V., Nikulenko E.V. The zoomorphic metaphor “bear” in the Russian, English, and Southern Siberian languages. Language and Culture, 2019, no. 45, pp. 78–95. https://doi.org/10.17223/19996195/45/6. (In Russian)
13. Zaliznyak A.A. Mnogoznachnost’ v yazyke i sposoby ee predstavleniya [Polysemy in Language and Ways of Its Representation]. Moscow, Vost. Lit., 2006. 671 p. (In Russian)
14. Berezovich E.L. Yazyk i traditsionnaya kul’tura: etnolingvisticheskie issledovaniya [Language and Traditional Culture: Ethnolinguistic Studies]. Moscow, Indrik, 2007. 599 p. (In Russian)
15. Golev N.D., Falomkina I.P. On the role of the anthropocentric factor in the realization of the derivational potential of names of ungulates as motivating lexical units. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2021, no. 3, pp. 191–210. https://doi.org/10.17223/1813 7083/76/15. (In Russian)
16. Putilov B.N. Epicheskoe skazitel’stvo [Epic Storytelling]. Moscow, Vost. Lit., 1997. 294 p. (In Russian)
17. Frazeologiya na peresechenii kul’tur: opyt Kazanskoi frazeologicheskoi shkoly [Phraseology at the Crossroads of Cultures: Looking back at the Kazan School of Phraseology]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 2025. 192 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Li F. Comparative analysis of the use of zoolexicon (zoonyms) in Russian traditional and modern folk songs (a case study of zoonyms denoting domestic animals). Kazan Journal of Historical, Linguistic, and Legal Research. 2025;167(5-6):168-178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2025.5-6.168-178
Views:
12
JATS XML
Email this article 