From the disintegration of the post-Soviet space to the integration projects of a multipolar world: A retrospective analysis
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2025.5-6.86-101
Abstract
This article reflects upon the integration processes within the post-Soviet space, spanning the period from 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed and the Belovezh Accords were signed, through 2024, which coincided with the BRICS summit held in Kazan on October 22–24 and marked the conclusion of Russia’s BRICS presidency. It is argued that the region has transformed to such an extent that contemporary scholars view it as part of Greater Eurasia or as Northeastern Eurasia, and the post-Soviet elites have long defined their political goals, with many adopting a multi-vector approach (where the partnership with Russia is one of such “vectors”). Particular attention is paid to the integration initiatives advocated by Russia. Using the results of a retrospective analysis, three stages of international political and economic processes in the post-Soviet space are identified: disintegration, diversification, and restructuring. The reasons behind the failure of the political integration projects in post-Soviet countries based on the Eurasian ideology and, conversely, the success of “functional” integration within the Eurasian Economic Union are discussed. It is concluded that the Russian Federation maintains its leadership in the space of North-Eastern Eurasia and also acts as a bridge between post-Soviet countries and emerging alternative centers of power represented by BRICS.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. G. Bolshakov
Kazan Federal University
Россия
Россия
Andrey G. Bolshakov, Dr. Sci. (Politics), Associate Professor, Head of Department of International Relations, World Politics and Diplomacy
Kazan, Russia
A. E. Fominykh
Mari State University
Россия
Россия
Alexey E. Fominykh, Cand. Sci. (Politics), Associate Professor, Department of Intercultural Communication
Yoshkar-Ola, Russia
References
1. Moiseev V.V. Sovetskii Soyuz: istoriya sozdaniya, razvitiya i raspada [The Soviet Union: A History of Formation, Development, and Collapse]. Moscow, Direkt-Media, 2022. 224 p. (In Russian)
2. Shevtsova L.F. Rezhim Borisa El’tsina [The Boris Yeltsin Regime]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 1999. 535 p. (In Russian)
3. Gushchin A.V., Khanova I.E. The post-Soviet space: Causes, process, and intermediate results of transformation. Rossiya i Sovremennyi Mir, 2019, no. 2 (103), pp. 53–66. https://doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2019.02.04. (In Russian)
4. Pashkovskii P.I. The problem of interpreting the “post-Soviet space” concept. Uchenye Zapiski imeni V.I. Vernadskogo. Filosofiya. Politologiya. Kul’turologiya, 2015, vol. 1 (67), no. 4, pp. 41–48. (In Russian)
5. Evdokimov M.N. The post-Soviet space: From “no-fault divorce” to multispeed and multiformat integration. International Affairs, 2021, no. 12, pp. 10–13. (In Russian)
6. Trenin D.V. Russia and the CIS countries: “Maturing” relations. In: Evolyutsiya postsovetskogo prostranstva: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [The Evolution of the Post-Soviet Space: Past, Present, and Future]. Moscow, NP RSMD, 2017, pp. 11–18. (In Russian)
7. Khazin A.L. BRICS 2024. Vzglyad iz Rossii. Novye prostory. Novye gorizonty [BRICS 2024. Russian Perspective. New Spaces. New Horizons]. Moscow, Nauka, 2024. 361 p. (In Russian)
8. Rapota G.A. The collapse of the Soviet Union left us in complete confusion. International Affairs, 2021, no. 12, pp. 8–9. (In Russian)
9. Rekeda S.V. The industrial profile of the EAEU countries: Effects of the first decade. Russia and New States of Eurasia, 2024, no. 1, pp. 25–41. https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2024-1-25-41. (In Russian)
10. Mastepanov A.M. Big cycles and “black swans”. Energeticheskaya Politika, 2020, no. 6 (148), pp. 4–19. (In Russian)
11. Bolgova I.V. Crisis of the EU eastern policy. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2014, no. 4 (37), pp. 133–138. (In Russian)
12. Druzhinin A.G. Idei klassicheskogo evraziistva i sovremennost’: obshchestvenno-geograficheskii analiz [Ideas of the Classical Eurasianism and the Modern World: A Socio-Geographical Analysis]. Rostov-on-Don, Taganrog, Izd. YuFU, 2021. 270 p. (In Russian)
13. Kheyfets B.A. Eurasian Economic Union – time for modernization. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 2019, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 29–50. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-2-29-50. (In Russian)
14. Podvintsev O.B. The idea of “failed states” from Russian political perspective. Nauchnyi Ezhegodnik Instituta Filosofii i Prava UrO RAN, 2007, no. 7, pp. 204–214. (In Russian)
15. Markedonov S.M. De facto states: The post-Soviet political phenomenon. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series “Political Science. History. International Relations”, 2018, no. 1 (11), pp. 24–40. https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6339-2018-1-24-40. (In Russian)
16. Luk’yanov V.Yu. The failed state problem in the foreign policies of Russia and the USA in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences”, 2023, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 14–23. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V255. (In Russian)
17. Kheyfets B.A. Novaya model’ mezhdunarodnoi ekonomicheskoi integratsii [A New Model of International Economic Integration]. Moscow, Inst. Ekon. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2023. 48 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Bolshakov A.G., Fominykh A.E. From the disintegration of the post-Soviet space to the integration projects of a multipolar world: A retrospective analysis. Kazan Journal of Historical, Linguistic, and Legal Research. 2025;167(5-6):86-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2025.5-6.86-101
Views:
10
JATS XML
Email this article 