The Features of Linguistic Reflection in Children with Different Language Acquisition Strategies (Based on the Results of an Experimental Study)

This article outlines the results of a study of the features of linguistic reflection peculiar to children with different strategies of language acquisition, which is important because this problem has remained out of the attention of researchers. All data for the subsequent analysis were obtained by the methods of ontolinguistic experiment and mathematical statistics, and the criterion of verbal explicitness was used for distinguishing the features of the reflection on language among children and for defining the key terms. It was revealed that boys and girls do not differ significantly in their reflection on language, so any clear gender-related trends are not supported by our study and can be only assumed. Furthermore, it was established that referential children and children from families with high sociocultural status are more capable of reflecting on language. On the contrary, children from families with low sociocultural status and expressive children have the lowest number of reflections on language or poor prerequisites for this ability, which they acquire later as compared with referential children and children from families with high sociocultural status; such children primarily need help to develop their reflection on language and prerequisites for it. These findings can be useful to children’s speech development specialists and for psycholinguistic and ontolinguistic research, and the experimental series can be of great help as a tool for developing the reflection on language.

1. Gvozdev A.N. Znachenie izucheniya detskogo yazyka dlya yazykoznaniya. Kak deti doshkol’nogo vozrasta nablyudayut yavleniya yazyka [The Importance of Learning Children’s Language for Linguistics. How Preschool Children Understand Language Phenomena]. St. Petersburg, Biont, 1999. 64 p. (In Russian)

2. Tseitlin S.N., Eliseeva M.B., Kuz’mina T.V., Galaktionova L.N., Trifonova T.A., Ital’yani M.P. (Tashman). Deti o yazyke: metayazykovaya deyatel’nost’ i yazykovaya refleksiya [Children about Language: Metalinguistic Activity and Reflection on Language]. St. Petersburg, Izd. RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena, 2022. 243 p. (In Russian)

3. Januschek F., Paprotte W., Rohde W. Zur Ontogenese sprachlicher Handlungen. Osnabrücker Beitrage zur Sprachtheorie, 1979, H. 10, S. 37–69. (In German)

4. Wehr S. Was wissen Kinder über Sprache? Bern, Stuttgart, Wien, Haupt Verlag, 2001. 193 S. (In German)

5. Alpatov V.M. Children’s reflection on language. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana. Trudy Instituta Lingvisticheskikh Issledovanii. St. Petersburg, Nauka, 2017, vol. XIII, pt. 3, pp. 811–819. (In Russian)

6. Gridina T.A. Metalinguistic reflection as a form of linguocreative thinking in children. Problemy ontolingvistiki – 2016: Materialy ezhegodnoi mezhdunar. nauch. konf. 23–26 marta 2016, Sankt-Peterburg [Problems of Ontolinguistics – 2016: Proc. Annu. Int. Sci. Conf. March 23–26, 2016, St. Petersburg]. Ivanovo, Listos, 2016, pp. 182–188. (In Russian)

7. Dobrova G.R. Variativnost’ rechevogo razvitiya detei [Variability in Children’s Language Acquisition]. Moscow, Yazyki Slav. Kul’t., 2018. 264 p. (In Russian)

8. Vorob’eva T.A. On the issue of differentiating children’s metalinguistic activity and their language reflection. Izvestiya RGPU imeni A.I. Gertsena, 2020, no. 196, pp. 61–68. URL: https://doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2020-196-61-68. (In Russian)

9. Tseitlin S.N. Yazyk i rebenok: Lingvistika detskoi rechi [Language and Child: Linguistics of Children’s Speech]. Moscow, Vlados, 2000. 240 p. (In Russian)

10. Shmeleva T.V. Language reflection. Teoreticheskie i Prikladnye Aspekty Rechevogo Obshcheniya: Vestnik Rossiiskoi Ritoricheskoi Assotsiatsii, 1999, no. 1(8), pp. 108–110. (In Russian)

11. Lyubina G.A. Why are they called that? Available at: http://dom-i-uyut.ru/2012/03/почему-же-так-называется/ (In Russian)

12. Eliseeva M.B. Renaming in the speech of children of early age. Logoped v Detskom Sadu, 2007, no. 2(17), pp. 5–11. (In Russian)

13. Papandropoulou I., Sinclair H. What is a word? Experimental study of children’s ideas on grammar. Human Development, 1974, no. 1, pp. 241–258. URL: https://doi.org/10.1159/000271348.

14. Gridina T.A. “Svoya igra”: rebenok v mire yazyka [“One’s Own Game”: A Child in the World of Language]. Yekaterinburg, FGBOU VPO “Ural. Gos. Pedagog. Univ.”, 2015. 177 p. (In Russian)

15. Eliseeva M.B., Romanenko V.G. Types of interpretations of the meanings of adjectives by inophone children and Russian-speaking children. Nachal’naya Shkola, 2014, no. 6, pp. 91–94. (In Russian)