The Problem of the Establishment of a Legitimate Language on the Example of the Introduction of Latin Graphics in the Mongolian People’s Republic during the 1930s
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.1-2.252-262
Abstract
In this article, the adoption of a legitimate language by the Mongolian People’s Republic following the language reform of the 1930s, which involved the switch to the Latin script, is considered. The language policy pursued by the MPR in the early 20th century is investigated from the perspective of the legitimate language theory. By that period, the traditional Mongolian script had become outdated and needed to be reformed. Furthermore, the illiteracy rate among Mongolian people was very high, and the old Mongolian script was difficult to study. Another reason is that the language turned into the main tool for promoting the new cultural and ideological values of the USSR. Thus, the shift of Mongolia to the writing system based on the Latin alphabet was a political phenomenon and played a key role in broadcasting the cultural policy of the new state. In the early years of the MPR, the Latin-based writing solved several problems at once: it promoted literacy among Mongolian people, gave greater publicity to the policy of the Mongolian People’s Revolutionary Party and the new culture, and became a platform to bring together Mongolia and the USSR. To substantiate the importance of the Latin graphics as the official state script, Pierre Bourdieu’s “Language and Symbolic Power” is analyzed, in which the author discusses the origin of the legitimate language and script, as well as their role in the process of nation building. Here, the documents in both Russian and Mongolian are also examined. The obtained results demonstrate that, despite various difficulties, the Latin script was adopted for a quite short period of time as legitimate in the MPR, which had a great influence on the development of the socialist culture and the Mongolian national identity.
References
1. Mayagmar S.-E. Official script changes in socialist Mongolia. In: Socialist and Post-Socialist Mongolia: Nation, Identity, and Culture. Wickhamsmith S., Marzluf Ph.P. (Eds.). London, Routledge, 2021, pp. 73–90.
2. Rossabi M. Zolotoi vek istorii mongolov [The Golden Age of the Mongol Empire]. St. Petersburg, Izd. Evraziya, 2009. 479 p. (In Russian)
3. Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ Vostoka [The Culture and Writing of the East]. Book 1. Moscow, Izd. VTsK NTA, 1928. 139 p. (In Russian)
4. Bourdieu P. Language and Symbolic Power. Thompson J.B. (Ed.). Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991. 291 p.
5. de Saussure F. Kurs obshchei lingvistiki [Course in General Linguistics]. Yekaterinburg, Izd. Ural. Univ., 1999. 432 p. (In Russian)
6. Spolsky B. Language Policy. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004. 250 p.
7. McCarty T. (Ed.) Ethnography and Language Policy. New York, Routledge, 2011. 328 p.
8. Yuzbashev N. Arabic and New Turkic alphabet. In: Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ Vostoka [Culture and Writing of the East]. Book 1. Moscow, Izd. VTsK NTA, 1928, pp. 65–80. (In Russian)
9. Tserendorzh G. Elimination of Illiteracy in the MPR. Ulaanbaatar, Shinzhlekh ukhaany akademiin khevlel, 1976. 113 p. (In Mongolian)
10. Shirendev B. A Brief History of the Academy of Sciences in the MPR. Ulaanbaatar, ShUAKh, 1980, 186 p. (In Mongolian)
11. Dashdavaa D, Tөmөrbat B. From the history of teaching the Russian language in Mongolia. In: Scientific Proceedings. Ulaanbaatar, Ulsyn khevleliin gazar, 1978, no. 10, pp. 120–126. (In Mongolian)
12. Otgonbaatar R., Tsendina A.D. Obraztsy pis’mennoi traditsii Severnoi Mongolii: alfavity, transkriptsii, yazyki (konets XVI – nachalo XX v.) [Examples of the Writing Tradition of Northern Mongolia: Alphabets, Transcriptions, and Languages (Late 16th–Early 20th Centuries)], Moscow, Nauka–Vost. Lit., 2014. 237 p. (In Russian)
13. Damdinsүren Ts. About improving the Mongolian language. In: A Collection of Scientific Articles. Vol. VII: A study of the Mongolian language. Ulaanbaatar, Soembo printing, 2017, pp. 82–111. (In Mongolian)
14. Mishig L. The study of the Mongolian language in the MPR and further goals. In: Some Problems of the Mongolian Writing System. Ulaanbaatar, Ulsyn khevleliin gazar, 1956, pp. 6–25. (In Mongolian)
15. Baradin B. Problems with strengthening the Buryat–Mongolian linguistic culture. In: Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ Vostoka [The Culture and Writing of the East]. Book 5. Baku, Izd. VTsK NA pri Prezidiume TsIK SSSR, 1929, pp. 3–27. (In Russian)
16. Chronicle: A conference of the Mongolian ethnic groups on writing and language. In: Kul’tura i pis’mennost’ Vostoka [The Culture and Writing of the East]. Book 9. Moscow, Izd. VTsK NA pri Prezidiume TsIK SSSR, 1931, pp. 66–77. (In Russian)
17. Bunčić D. Factors influencing the success and failure of writing reforms. Studi Slavistici, 2017, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 21–46. doi: 10.13128/Studi_Slavis-21937.
18. Rassadin V.I. About the problems of the etymologization of words in the Mongolian languages. Mongolovedenie, 2007, no. 4, pp. 27–40. (In Russian)
19. Davaasambuu P. Historical Overview of the Cultural and Educational Work in the MPR. Ulaanbaatar, Ulsyn khevlel gazar, 1975. 190 p. (In Mongolian)
20. Bourdieu P. The production and reproduction of legitimate language. Otechestvennye Zapiski, 2005, no. 2. Available at: https://strana-oz.ru/2005/2/o-proizvodstve-i-vosproizvodstvelegitimnogo-yazyka. (In Russian)
21. Poppe N.N. The problems of word formation in the Buryat–Mongolian language. In: Revolyutsiya i pis’mennost’: Sbornik nomer 2 [Revolution and Writing: A Collection of Articles No. 2]. Moscow, Leningrad, Izd. VTsK NA pri Prezidiume TsIK SSSR, 1936, pp. 77–81. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Bikmaeva K.I. The Problem of the Establishment of a Legitimate Language on the Example of the Introduction of Latin Graphics in the Mongolian People’s Republic during the 1930s. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2023;165(1-2):252-262. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2023.1-2.252-262
Views:
107
Email this article 