Constitutionalization of Arbitration
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.3.81-96
Abstract
The number of arbitration cases handled by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has steadily increased over the years. The evolution of social practices and judicial approaches to arbitration procedures has prompted the supreme body for judicial protection of the Russian Constitution to repeatedly review whether the legal concepts used to resolve civil disputes by arbitration courts and international commercial arbitrations align with the nation’s basic law. The outcome of this process is a set of legal principles that define the constitutional and judicial foundations of arbitration in Russia. The above trends have facilitated the use of the integrative concept of constitutionalism in arbitration. This study highlights the constitutionalization of both arbitration and its social application. From a standalone perspective, the problems of enhancing the constitutional and legal principles of arbitration were discussed, and the further progress of constitutionalism in Russian arbitration was predicted.
About the Author
S. A. Kurochkin
Ural State Law University named after V.F. Yakovlev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yekaterinburg, 620066 Russia
References
1. Lazarev V.V. On the integrative understanding of constitutionalism. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava, 2023, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 39–53. https://doi.org/10.12737/jrp.2023.050. (In Russian)
2. Bondar N.S. Sudebnyi konstitutsionalizm: doktrina i praktika [Judicial Constitutionalism: Doctrine and Practice]. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M, 2015. 527 p. (In Russian)
3. Kokotov A.N. On the legislative aspects of the rulings issued by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Rossiiskaya Yustitsiya, 2014, no. 4, pp. 21–24. (In Russian)
4. Zorkin V.D. Tsivilizatsiya prava i razvitie Rossii [Civilization of Law and Development of Russia]. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M, 2016. 416 p. (In Russian)
5. Skvortsov O.Yu. On the conservative model of arbitration. Zakon, 2017, no. 9, pp. 60–64. (In Russian)
6. Kuz’min A.G. Konstitutsionalizatsiya rossiiskogo pravosudiya (arbitrazhno-sudebnyi aspekt): problemy teorii i praktiki [Constitutionalization of Russian Justice (Arbitration and Judicial Settlement): Theoretical and Practical Issues]. Moscow, Gorodets, 2016. 367 p. (In Russian)
7. Skvortsov O.Yu. Constitutional Court: The legal stance on arbitration practice (gradually advocating for the liberal principles through conservative opposition against radicalism in judicial practice). Treteiskii Sud, 2023, no. 1/2, pp. 56–68. (In Russian)
8. Bondar N.S. Norms and doctrines behind of the rulings of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as the legal sources. Zhurnal Rossiiskogo Prava, 2007, no. 4, pp. 75–85. (In Russian)
9. Salikov M.S. On the essence of the legal stance of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Rossiiskii Yuridicheskii Zhurnal, 2003, no. 1, pp. 14–17. (In Russian)
10. Kruss V.I. Konstitutsionalizatsiya prava: osnovy teorii: monografiya [The Constitutionalization of Law: Fundamentals of Theory: A Monograph.] Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M, 2016. 239 p. (In Russian)
11. Nasyrova T.Ya. Teleologicheskoe (tselevoe) tolkovanie sovetskogo zakona: teoriya i praktika [Teleological (Targeted) Interpretation of the Soviet Law: Theory and Practice]. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 1988. 143 p. (In Russian)
12. Zorkin V.D. Konstitutsionnyi Sud Rossii: doktrina i praktka [The Constitutional Court of Russia: Doctrine and Practice]. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M, 2018. 592 p. (In Russian)
13. Khabrieva T.Ya., Chirkin V.E. Teoriya sovremennoi konstitutsii [The Theory of Modern Constitution]. Moscow, Norma, 2005. 319 p. (In Russian)
14. Kutafin O.E. Predmet konstitutsionnogo prava [The Subject of Constitutional Law]. Moscow, Yurist”, 2001. 443 p. (In Russian)
15. Komarova V.V. Real and imaginary expansion of the subject of constitutional law. Aktual’nye Problemy Rossiiskogo Prava, 2018, no. 10, pp. 11–23. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.95.10.011-023. (In Russian)
16. Kleandrov M.I. Ekonomicheskoe pravosudie v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Economic Justice in Russia: On the Past, Present, and Future]. Moscow, Wolters Kluwer, 2006. 579 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kurochkin S.A. Constitutionalization of Arbitration. Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2024;166(3):81-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.3.81-96
Views:
1361
Email this article 