Worldview and Ideology through the Eyes of «Comandante Akopo»
https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.2.223-233
Abstract
This article reviews the legacy of Hakob Pogosovich Nazaretyan (1947–2019), a distinguished Russian scholar, with a focus on the ideologization of societies and meaning formation as the major challenges of our time. The concept of historical singularity, a phenomenon of planetary significance that shapes the emerging scenarios of today’s world landscape, is defined. The growing importance, both for the international community and Russians, of maintaining a balance between the technological and humanistic aspects of universal culture to effectively address the escalating global crisis is highlighted. Based on the analysis of H.P. Nazaretyan’s key works, the role of ideology in this process, its productive anti-entropic function in the past and counterproductivity in the present and future, is examined.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. KhokhlovRussian Federation
А. А. Pinkin
Russian Federation
Independent Researcher
References
1. Nazaretyan H.P. Nelineinoe budushchee. Megaistoriya, sinergetika, kul’turnaya antropologiya i psikhologiya v global’nom prognozirovanii [Nonlinear Future. Megahistory, Synergetics, Cultural Anthropology, and Psychology in Global Forecasting]. Moscow, Argamak-Media, 2015. 508 p. (In Russian)
2. D’yakonov I.M. Puti istorii. Ot drevneishego cheloveka do nashikh dnei [Historical Paths. From Archaic Humans until Now]. Moscow, Vost. Lit., 1994, 382 (In Russian)
3. Grinin L.E., Korotaev A.V. (Eds.) Evolyutsiya: Evolyutsionnye grani singulyarnosti [Evolution: Evolutionary Constraints of Singularity]. Volgograd, Uchitel’, 2020. 416 p. (In Russian)
4. White L.A. Energy and the evolution of culture. Voprosy Sotsial’noi Teorii, 2017, vol. 9, pp. 39–63. (In Russian)
5. Nazaretyan H.P. Meaning formation as a global problem of our time: A synergetic perspective. Voprosy Filosofii, 2009, no. 5, pp. 3–19. (In Russian)
6. Harris S. Konets very: religiya, terror i budushchee razuma [The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason]. Zavalova M.I. (Trans.). Moscow, Eksmo, 2011. 483 p. (In Russian)
7. Mirkovic A. The real end of history. In: Rodrigue B., Grinin L., Korotayev A. (Eds.) From Big Bang to Galactic Civilizations: A Big History Anthology. Pt. III: Big history as an active life position. Vol. 1: Our place in the Universe. An Introduction to big history. Delhi, Primus Books, 2015, pp. 188–208.
8. Nazaretyan A.P. The splendor and misery of biocentric ecology: On the 50th Anniversary of the Club of Rome. Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya i Sotsiologiya Istorii, 2018, vol. 11, pp. 5–38. (In Russian)
9. Eden A.H., Moor J.H., Søraker J.H., Steinhart E. (Eds.). Singularity Hypotheses. A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Ser.: The Frontiers Collection. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2012. 441 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32560-1.
10. Joy B. Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired, Apr. 1, 2000. URL: https://www.csun.edu/~vcspc00g/454/joyfuture.html.
11. Tishkov V.A., Shabaev Yu.P. Etnopolitologiya: Politicheskie funktsii etnichnosti [Ethnopolitology: Political Functions of Ethnicity]. Moscow, Izd. Mosk. Univ., 2019. 375 p. (In Russian)
12. Asmolov et al. Chelovek kak sub”ekt i ob”ekt mediapsikhologii [A Human as a Subject and Object of Media Psychology]. Vartanova E.L. et al. (Eds.). Moscow, MGU im. M.V. Lomonosova, 2011. 823 p. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Khokhlov A.A., Pinkin А.А. Worldview and Ideology through the Eyes of «Comandante Akopo». Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki. 2024;166(2):223-233. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/2541-7738.2024.2.223-233